Skip navigation

Email. Email. Email.

 

Today, I got to geek out about #socbiz with Michael Brito, SVP of Social Business Planning @EdelmanDigital


During our conversation, I talked about an interesting question that was posed on the community this week by Esther Goh "does social actual decrease email or does it just move the same conversation to a new technology?"  Esther was referencing a Jive customer survey we released last year that showcased the following employee engagement benefits:


https://community.jivesoftware.com/servlet/JiveServlet/showImage/38-3859-47965/Survey+summary+for+TechCrunch+Interview-6.pptx-5.jpg


Here are my thoughts: according to IDC, the average knowledge worker spends 13 hours per week writing and reading emails. That represents an annualized cost per employee of $21,000. This number likely stretches higher in higher-paying organizations or verticals, and for higher job roles. There are even indications the IDC numbers are quite conservative. A survey of 1,000 workers in the United Kingdom by Star, a provider of on-demand computing and communication services, found that employees spend, on average, 32.5, 8-hour work days a year on email alone.

 

The benefits of social tools are undeniable. Based on sheer adoption numbers (ie. hundreds of millions of Facebook users ), consumer social platforms have clearly illustrated a tremendous ROI in terms of allowing consumers to more easily communicate with friends and family and share information. For example, my best friend posts 100s of pictures of her baby on Facebook.  Sometimes, she will send out an email with a link to the photo-album.  This shows that social doesn't eliminate email, but changes its purpose– it's not a new message just different.

 

Reducing time spent by 27% would then represent a cost savings of greater than $5,000 per employee, per year. Beyond hard dollar savings, reducing email has other beneficial effects.

 

Social platforms for enterprise logically extend these capabilities. IMO, I don't think the survey would be fair if it didn't take into consideration things like email notifications so I would hope that the 27% is actually less email into your inbox, net of the alerts.

 

Social technologies, like Jive, make information more accessible and more searchable by the entire organization and breaking down information silos that lead to related inefficiencies.  So it’s more than just a technology swap (ie. Email vs. announcement in a Jive group).  Social actual helps organizations be more productive.

 

Social isn’t just a replacement for traditional communications either.  For example, survey respondents also noted that meetings work better in conjunction with social business tools due to social mechanisms for capturing unstructured information through tags and other collaboration tools and annotation tools.

 

Even though we are now in the Post-Dilbert era, jokes about corporate life and copious time wasted sitting in unnecessary meetings and replying to useless email chains still ring true for many employees and senior managers alike. Social business appears to alleviate and moderate these woes and not just transfer them from one technology to the next.

 

What are your thoughts on this common debate?

deirdrewalsh

Join Jive @SXSW

Posted by deirdrewalsh Feb 28, 2012

When people think of SXSW, they often imagine hipsters, rockers, actors, and drunkards descending down upon my hometown Austin.  But I'm here to tell you that it's more than "spring break for adults."

 

I've attended SXSW Interactive for the last decade.  During these conferences, I've networked with amazing social strategists like Jeremiah Owyang and Guy Kawasaki; discovered new technologies (hello, I got on Twitter in March 2007); and learned practical tips on how to build a word-class social program. So, if you are going to this year's event, we would love to connect with you!

 

 

SXSW POSTER FINAL.jpg

Jive House Party

Take a break from the intensity of the sessions and the hustle of the bars.  We are hosting an old-skool house party.

 

We'll have plenty of local food, including a mini-taco bar; an open bar stocked with Austin's best brews; and tunes spun by my favorite mixmaster, DJ Chicken George.

 

It's more than just a scene from a cheesy teen movie.  The best part of this intimate event will be the conversation. We are going to have plenty of networking opportunities, including real-life #tagging, and customers from companies like National Instruments.

 

Some of the Jive folks you'll meet include:

Ryan Rutan - Jive Community Mastermind

kristina - Brewspace Bada** (our internal community)

Mark Weitzel - Mr. "Open Social"

Karen To - Crushin' Corp Comm Expert

 

If you plan on attending, please RSVP!

 

Interactive Sessions

There are more than 1000 sessions this year, but here are some of the ones I'm personally most excited about:

Social Business Meet Up

Big Data + Social Graph

Security and Privacy in Social Networks

The B2B Social Media Book

Programming Social Applications

@BettyDraper's Guide to Social Storytelling

Social Role-Playing: Brands and Publishers

Everything You Need to Know About B2B Marketing

Humanizing B2B Brands with Video & Comedy

The Promise and Pitfalls of Real-Time Marketing




Where Will YOU Be?

 

Share in the comments below which sessions and events you are looking forward to so that you can connect with others in the Jive Community.


Can't Attend?

 

Stay updated throughout the conference by following @JiveSoftware on Twitter.

Not a modern sales approach.jpg

 

Almost as soon as I began, I knew I was losing my audience.


I was in a retail banking branch, trying to explain the benefits of Jive to the staff. And they were skeptical.


“We’re very busy with clients. We don’t have time for other things.” “How much does it cost? We’re very focused on profitability.”


Words like “Jive” or “social intranet” or “micro-blogging” didn’t mean much to them. I quickly needed to change my approach.


“What’s the point?”

What is it?.jpg

 

The problem was that I was talking about what I had instead of talking about what they needed. They didn’t want yet another tool or thing to do. They wanted help.


So I started over.


“Our goal is to make things easier for you. Easier to find answers and experts. Easier to share better ways of working with people who do what you do. Easier to coordinate work in your group and across groups.

 

If we make all of that easier, we’ll make your jobs better while we unlock tremendous value for our company.”


Making work easier in 3 ways

They weren’t convinced, but focusing on making their lives easier bought me some time.


Now I could describe how Jive can make their jobs easier. (Luckily, I had met recently with one of Jive’s most articulate experts, Kathryn Everest, and she gave me some great ideas.)

 

Sometimes, you need to go to a place - a destination - to get things done. It could be the latest information on a project or about a client or a product. It’s just a website, but with some modern advantages. You can see feedback from other people - comments, ratings, or “likes” - that let you know what’s helpful or not. And searching is simple and fast.

 

These are all things you’re used to at home but not in the office. Now we can fix that.


The second way we make things easier is with a Facebook-like stream. It lets you follow things you care about - people, groups, documents, websites - and get notified in real-time. The things that matter to you are delivered in a way that’s easy to skim quickly but that also allows for comments and other feedback.


And the tools themselves are convenient and engaging. That means iPad and iPhone access, for example. It means consolidating several of the tools we have into one place. And it means integration with our email system, Outlook. That lets you see all Jive activity right from your inbox. And lets you push email discussions into Jive so whole conversations can now be searchable and more inclusive.

 

Business examples in their language

You can describe Jive and the 3 ways it makes work easier in a long elevator ride. The key is relating it to what people do every day.


So, in the retail branch, I asked how they get answers to questions about products or processes.

 

“There’s a number to call,” they said. “Sometimes we have to wait on the phone for 10 minutes.”

 

Then I talked about ways we can use the new platform to increase self-service at work. About what other companies like Apple and T-Mobile have done using Jive.

 

What about learning the best ways to do certain things, like selling particular products?

 

“There’s a website for the basics. But usually I ask other people in the branch, and that can take time.”

 

Then I talked about richer websites maintained by trained curators. And communities of practice where people in similar jobs across the firm can share best practices and help each other.


Getting answers. Finding experts. Sharing best practices. Coordinating work. Across divisions and across firms, you tend to find the same collaboration needs and patterns. The jargon will differ, but the underlying concepts and issues will be the same.

 

Depending on how much time you have, you can keep going through your common use cases and relating them to your audience.


Making it personal

Opportunity.jpg


Towards the end, I made it personal.


I asked people in the branch how they would know about great jobs in other branches. And how would anyone besides their manager know about them and their skills?


There was a pause. A young woman answered, somewhat wistfully, “Some people work in the same branch for 30 years.”


Then I talked about how collaborating online makes their work visible. How it gives them control over their reputation - who they are, what they do, and how well they do it - and unlocks access to good jobs.


Speaking multiple languages, for example, was in high demand. Would a Frankfurt-based bank employee who spoke Italian be interested in a job on the Amalfi coast? Would they contribute on-line if it meant they could be more visible?


“Yes, of course! That would be great.”


Always. Be. Closing.

Using Jive is good for the individual because it makes their job easier while giving them a way to shape their reputation and access opportunities.

 

And it’s good for the firm. Good for finding waste and eliminating it. Good for finding commercial opportunities and exploiting them. Good for finding great people and giving them the best jobs.

 

“Now, let’s set up our next meeting. Let’s start changing the way you work.”

Give Your Customer Service Organization an Inside Advantage

 

support.pngWhen you hear the phrase “customer service community” what do you think of? I’m betting that for most people, the first (and maybe only) thing that comes to mind is a public-facing customer community.  And no doubt, public communities are the centerpiece of any social customer service solution. But it would be a huge mistake to overlook the critical role of internal communities in customer service.

 

Internal communities offer a leap in service team effectiveness, allowing employees to share best practices, put their heads together to solve tough cases, and alert each other to important feedback, emerging issues, and trends. By spreading vital knowledge across the entire group, they can make the whole team as smart as its smartest members. Given the inevitable turnover in support staff and the high cost of training, the ability to capture and preserve expertise saves a boatload of money.

 

Compare this to the traditional tools still used by many service organizations: e-mail, IM, static intranets, wikis, and the like. Vast amounts of effort and information are lost or duplicated in such systems. Without an internal community, your customer service agents have to resort to those traditional, siloed systems to hunt for answers.

 

Many of our most successful customers have expanded from internal- or external-only communities to a combination internal and external, realizing big synergies in the process.

 

T-Mobile, for instance, backs its 150,000-strong Jive-based customer service community with internal collaborative communities, also powered by Jive. As T-Mobile Enterprise Community Manager Will Rose explains, their service staff used to rely on a  patchwork of nine separate systems for their knowledge base, customer feedback, collaboration and other functions. Now all those activities are supported by T-Mobile’s Jive communities, resulting in major improvements in knowledge sharing, rep effectiveness,call deflection and resolution rates.

 

Another customer, StrongMail, has two Jive communities—one for employees and one for customers—integrated via bridging. Bridging makes possible a variety of features that leverage the complementary relationship between internal and external communities. So, for example, customer service agents should be able to easily pull in unanswered questions from the external community, collaborate on the answers with employees who don't normally go to the customer community, and push them back out to the customers. In StrongMail's case, this has enabled their service organization to put customer concerns front and center inside the company and tap their globally distributed workforce to rapidly answer critical customer questions.

 

Bridging can also simplify knowledge base creation, with features that allow users to take a customer discussion, turn it into a document with a single click, edit it, and, with a few more clicks, publish it as a searchable, fully indexed article in the internal or external community.

 

These are some of the ways an internal community can not only make your service team better, but improve your external community, too.

 

Bottom line: if you’re leaving employee collaboration out of the customer service equation, you're missing out on some of the key benefits of social. It’s only logical to give your service team the same advantages you give to customers. That’s why Jive has bundled a 100-member team community as standard equipment in our Customer Service Solution to work alongside the customer-facing community. It makes sense.

 

If you would like to connect with others who are interested in customer service check out the group: The specified item was not found.

 

Screen Shot 2011-12-20 at 11.33.49 AM.png

Jive's Customer Service Solution includes team and customer communities with bridging; Fathom and Fathom Pro social media monitoring; and integration with CRM and Microsoft Outlook.  For more information check out the Customer Service Toolkit

Hello everyone! This topic is very 'up' for me right now (meaning: re-channeling a rant ) so I thought it might make a good blog post here. Today's message is:

 

no-internet-censorship.jpg

If you already agree with this message, feel free to stop reading right here. But before you go, see if you have been asked any of these questions:

 

  • Having a customer community or being on social media is great, but what if customers bash us?
  • Can we just delete negative comments?
  • Don't rants just poison the well? Is there any benefit to such 'discussions'?

 

In answering these questions, my focus is on customer relationships. But these principles apply to employee communities as well. Just replace 'customers' with 'employees' and see how that may fit for you.

 

Question: What if customers bash us in the community?

 

Answer: If customers want to bash us, they're going to do it anyway.

  • Better that they do it inside our community rather than out in public
  • Having the feedback occur in the community means we are more likely to see it, and can respond
  • If customers are bashing us, this is an opportunity to have a conversation with the customers, where we can either:
    • Provide explanations
    • Learn from their feedback
    • Make improvements to our products or services
      (for great examples of companies learning from, and making changes due to, customer feedback - see Sameer Patel's excellent post Synchronicity)

 

Question: Can't we just delete the negative comments?

 

Answer: Yes, we could. But it is the wrong thing to do. The backlash created by deleting a customer comment could be even greater than the original comment itself. Also, just because a comment is deleted doesn't mean it is gone. Someone could have taken a screen shot. If the community system has email notifications, then multiple copies of the original comment are still out there in the world.

 

If a customer comment is deleted, what message does that send?

     "We don't want your feedback."

     "We don't like that comment."

     "We don't agree with your comment."

 

These are all opportunities for conversation and relationship building. (Except maybe the first one - "We don't want your feedback." A company that does not want feedback should take a hard look in the mirror on that one.)

 

Why is this topic so hot for me? A complaint discussion in our customer community was started a few weeks ago. The thread now has 118 replies, 1,577 views, and still growing.

 

With numbers like these, the situation could be characterized as an out-of-control wildfire. But thankfully, because of swift and continued attention, the situation is a controlled burn. And just like a controlled fire, my hope is that the environment will be cleaner and healthier after the ashes have settled.

 

If this discussion were occurring on the public web, I would imagine the number of replies and views would be much higher.

 

If we were to delete this discussion from our private community, I think the backlash would be spectacular. #EPICFAIL, anyone?

 

Question: Do negative community threads like this provide any benefit to anyone?

 

Answer: YES. Reading firsthand customer frustration is not fun. Some of the content may be just venting or bashing. But it is a matter of separating the wheat from the chaff. There is a lot of valuable information to be gained:

  • What are the specific pain points?
  • Is better or additional training needed?
  • Are the customers reporting issues that we didn't anticipate?


Benefits:

  • Show up. Participate. Demonstrate to customers that the company is listening and that we care
  • Provide answers. If one person is confused, others may have same question
  • Damage control. Correct mis-information. Quell rumors
  • Learn which areas of our systems and processes can be improved


gift.jpg

As painful as negative comments might be, they actually a gift. Customers are taking the time to tell us:

  • What they need
  • How they are affected
  • What they care about
  • How we can help them be successful

 

Why would we want to turn our back on these gifts? So my message today is: Don't put a muzzle on the gift horse. Use complaints and negative feedback as an opportunity to have a conversation, learn, and build stronger relationships.

 

Trisha Liu is the Enterprise Community Manager at HP ArcSight. She is a Jive Software Champion and Charter member of the Community BackChannel. You can follow Trisha on Twitter (@mor_trisha) or on Google+.

Jive+2011+Highlights+Infographic_FINAL.jpg

Today we are hosting our first earnings conference call as a public company -- a major first for many reasons. Without going into all the details (which you'll see below) Jive had a great 2011. Bottom-line:  it's been a legendary year for Jive. 2011 could not

 

have been possible without our customers -- the visionaries in this space. A big thank you from all of us at Jive!

 

To our customers, I've said it once and I'll say it again, you are the agents of change. Together as a team, we have shown that social is no longer just the new way to business. It is rapidly becoming the only way to do business.

 

In the video below, Matt, Bill, and I -- along with some of our customers -- talk about how social is transforming work. It's the truth -- the future is bright -- not just for Jive, but for our social business ecosystem. I often reflect upon how you don't get many moments in your career to say "I was there" when a massive paradigm shift took place. And let me tell you, we are here now. If you look back on 2011, and ahead to 2012, social is the new currency in all of our interactions, personally and professionally.


 

Setup

 

(Note: this part was written back on 1/25/11.  And apologies if the images are difficult to read, pop them open and they will be just fine.)

 

A few weeks ago, Deirdre Walsh tasked me with writing a Jive Community blog post about how we could use Jive Fathom to monitor the ads that are played during the Super Bowl.  Here's what I've done, so far, with final analysis to come after the game airs:

 

I gathered the list of potential advertisers from multiple sources (for some reason, some advertisers like to keep mum about their Super Bowl ad plans), notably:

 

Set up 50+ (and counting) monitors for various brand names.  Many of the larger advertisers are doing specific product line ads, so there may be some overlap.  For instance, Chevrolet is running separate commercials for at least 4 car models.  I've split those into separate monitors to get more fine-grained results.

 

Here's the list of brands with more than one monitor, and the reasoning behind that:

 

BrandProducts or TermsNotes
AcuraAcura, Seinfeld, Soup NaziSeinfeld and Soup Nazi Return in Funny Acura SuperBowl Ad
AudiAudi, Twilight, vampireAudi is doing a vampire themed commercial: Super Bowl Ad: Vampires are no match for the Audi S7s LED headlights - Top Speed
BudweiserBudweiser, Bud Light, #makeitplatinumBudweiser is one of a few companies that has set up it's own hashtag for the Super Bowl.
ChevroletSonic, Volt, Camaro, SilveradoMultiple cars lines, under the Chevy umbrella.
ChryslerChrysler, FiatMost people will probably respond with "Fiat," but this covers both bases.
Coca-ColaCoca-Cola, CokeChoose your own adventure/ending type of ad, based on outcome of game, with polar bears.
DannonDannon, OikosIt's unclear whether this will be an ad for Dannon, or for their Greek yogurt brand, Oikos.  These should capture both, unless people can't spell Oikos.
H&MH&M, Beckham

Rumor has it that David Beckham will be modeling his new underwear line for retailer H&M.  Will people post about Beckham or H&M?  Capturing both.  Perhaps I should turn on the Fathom Pro image search for this one...

Fashion News: Super Bowl ad features David Beckham in H&M underwear - latimes.com

HondaCR-V, Ferris BuellerThis ad is causing a huge stir on the interwebs, as it was released already.  I suspect that we'll miss some of the results if people misspell "bueller."   Ferris Bueller Super Bowl Commercial: Matthew Broderick Reprises Role For Ad (VIDEO)
KiaKia, Motley, Lima, ChuckKia is debuting a male-fantasy commercial that includes super model Adriana Lima, Motley Crue, and martial arts fighter Chuck Liddell:  2012 Kia Super Bowl Ad Features Supermodel Adriana Lima - No Hamsters
M&MsM&M, brownThe Mars company is unveiling a new character: Ms. Brown: Super Bowl XLVI Commercial To Anchor Marketing Launch Of M&M’s Ms. Brown | The Big Lead
PricelinePriceline, ShatnerShatner is as much of a brand as Priceline, if not more.  Capturing both.
VolkswagenVW, BeetleAd will be for the new Beetle, but I wanted to make sure we capture people simply referring to the car as a VW.  VW stole the show last year with their kid-as-Vader commercial, so they're under considerable pressure to repeat.  VW Reveals Much-Anticipated Beetle Ad Ahead of Super Bowl | Special: Super Bowl - Advertising Age

 

I've limited the data I'm searching to only Facebook and Twitter.  I really want to focus on the immediate results on the social web.  This will reduce numbers, but hone in more specifically on those immediate and gut reactions.

 

There are also several ads that are only being run in select markets; I'm not tracking those.

 

I've added several qualifier words.  My results need to contain at least one of the following words or terms: superbowl, super bowl, commercial, xlvi, in addition to the target ("ALL") term.  This will also reduce the result set, but it will ensure the results we're picking up are directly related to the commercial that aired during the Super Bowl.

 

monitor.png

 

A preliminary check looks like Ferris Bueller and his ad for the Honda CR-V are early winners; we'll see if they can hold onto their lead...

 

ferris.png

 

Analysis

 

Well, it's Monday February, 6th, and the Super Bowl has come and gone.  How did the advertisers fare?  There were some definite winners, and some who probably wish they hadn't spent $3.5 million on a 30 second spot.  Because there were so many types of advertisers, I've broken the results out into categories.  After running through those, I'll do a summary analysis.

 

Consumer Products (not cars, not beer)

 

The top six advertisers in this category were:

 

AdvertiserNumber of Mentions*
M&M67,020
Pepsi34,032
H&M (using the "Beckman" monitor)12,669
Coke12,029
Samsung8,140
GoDaddy6,333

* remember, these are only Facebook and Twitter mentions...


M&M mention trends.png


Beer

 

The Budweiser company had several different products in the advertising mix.  In addition, they had a hashtag they released for the Super Bowl: #makeitplatinum, which appears to have been a bit of a flop, based on mentions.  Their commercial with the rescue dog, "Weego," was a hit.  Here are the results of the beer category (in which Budweiser essentially competed against themselves):

 

AdvertiserNumber of Mentions*
Bud Light15,576
Budweiser13,361
#makeitplatinum1,248

* remember, these are only Facebook and Twitter mentions...

 

Total BudweiserTotal Number of Mentions*
Budweiser30,185

 

Bud Light mention trends.png

 

Cars

 

Cars are the category that most people expect great things from, commercial-wise, during the Super Bowl.  This year had some good commercials that resonated with folks.  In order to dig into the details, I've broken the cars section into two two different categories, foreign and domestic.

 

Foreign

 

AdvertiserNumber of Mentions*
Audi14,497
Kia9,279
Hyundai7,778
VW7,764
Honda (Ferris Bueller monitor)6,394
Acura5,974
Acura (Seinfeld monitor)5,305
VW (Beetle monitor)2,193

* remember, these are only Facebook and Twitter mentions...


There are couple interesting things to delve into in the above data.  Several car companies did well with the multiple monitors I have set up.  You'll notice VW and Acura have four entries in the above table.  They were split out to ensure I caught all mentions by a particular advertiser.  For instance, many, many users referenced "Seinfeld" without mentioning "Acura."  The Seinfeld-specific monitor captured those.  So, if we roll the totals for Acura and VW together, we get a slightly different view of the data:


AdvertiserTotal Number of Mentions*
Audi14,497
Acura11,279
VW9,957
Kia9,279
Hyundai7,778
Honda (Ferris Bueller monitor)6,394

* remember, these are only Facebook and Twitter mentions...

 

Looking at the data split out graphically, this is what we see:

 

Foreign cars mention trends.png

 

What's interesting to note from the above graph, is that the "Ferris Bueller" Honda ad created a huge stir when it was first released on January 30th.  On that day, we captured 17,998 articles, by far more than any other car maker, on Super Bowl Sunday.  However, they weren't able to sustain that momentum of mentions through the Super Bowl.  Finally, Lexus and Suzuki barely registered (and aren't included above): they each had < 1,000 mentions.

 

Domestic

 

AdvertiserNumber of Mentions*
Chrysler16,947
Chrysler (Fiat monitor)13,885
Chevy (Sonic monitor)3,518
Chevy (Camaro monitor)3,380
Chevy (Volt monitor)485
Cadillac401

* remember, these are only Facebook and Twitter mentions...


If we roll this data up, we'll see a similar outcome, with Chrysler at the top:

 

AdvertiserTotal Number of Mentions*
Chrysler30,832
Chevy7,383
Cadillac401

* remember, these are only Facebook and Twitter mentions...

 

And here's the data, graphically:

 

Domestic cars mention trends.png

 

Winners

 

Looking at the data for Super Bowl day only, here are the top 5 advertisers, as picked up on Facebook and Twitter, based on mentions.

 

AdvertisersNumber of Mentions*
M&M67,020
Pepsi34,032
Chrysler30,832
Budweiser30,185
Audi14,497

* remember, these are only Facebook and Twitter mentions...


One more thing: if we include all the Facebook and Twitter mentions for "Ferris Bueller," starting when the ad was first released (Jan. 30) until today, Ferris squeaks into the top 3 based on mentions:

 

AdvertiserTotal Number of Mentions*
Honda (Ferris Bueller monitor)33,814

* remember, these are only Facebook and Twitter mentions...


But, who was the real winner?  It was, of course, Madonna.  Would you expect anything less from Madge?  Madonna had more mentions than all of the top advertisers.  And the Puppy Bowl did well, too, beating all of the top advertisers except M&Ms.  Part of these results might be that the halftime show and the Puppy Bowl were on for a significantly longer duration than the typical 30 second ad slot.  Or, part of it could simply be that Madonna is Madonna, and puppies are cute.

 

OthersNumber of Mentions*
Madonna97,859
Puppy Bowl41,140

* remember, these are only Facebook and Twitter mentions...


madge.png


Keep in mind that these are raw counts of mentions, only.  The cool thing about Fathom Pro is that it also analyzes the sentiment of each item returned.  But I might just wait to dig into sentiment analysis for another post on another topic.  2012 election, maybe?


What was your favorite commercial of the Super Bowl?

Filter Blog

By date: By tag: