4 Replies Latest reply on May 20, 2010 10:42 AM by AmandaS

    What Status level settings (aka Reputation point settings) did you use?

      This is another interesting decision point for our implementation.  I saw Carl Smith's list of initial values from his implementation and wanted to see what others have defined for participation levels.  As a Life Sciences company, I am resisting the urge to try to come up with a cute tiering based on biology (especially since I'm a non-scientist) and probably should stick with something which sticks along the same lines as the principles which Carl articulated:

       

      • Tiers should grow logarithmically, with early tiers making easier to gain status (see progress) and later tiers representing a well-earned, quality achievement.

       

      • Use graphics that indicate progress and communicates that there are award levels yet to be earned. This Status Icon 1.png ; not this Status Icon 2.png

       

      • Choose names that related to community and would work internationally.

       

       

      Appreciate seeing how you approached this decision.